Israelis Demand Social Justice - But What of
the Palestinians?
A tent city in Tel Aviv set up to
draw attention to the high cost of housing in Israel has sparked a mass protest
movement across the country. Last weekend over three hundred thousand Israelis marched
in protest. “The people,” they chanted, “want social justice!”
Stagnant
wages, rising prices and cutbacks in social welfare have indeed been making
life unbearable for a growing number of Israelis. A struggle against this is long
overdue. However, the current protest movement has limited itself to demanding
“social justice” only for Israelis. Meanwhile, right under the protesters’ noses
in Israel, not to mention in Gaza, the West Bank and beyond, Palestinians
suffer the most terrible deprivation and oppression.
Revolutionary
socialists join with today’s protesters in condemning the policies of
Netanyahu’s Likud government (as well as those of Labor and Kadima
before it), which have ensured that a growing number of Israelis have fallen
deeper into poverty while Israel’s capitalist profiteers have laughed all the
way to the bank. But we challenge the protesters: if the cost of living is becoming
unbearable for Israelis, consider what life is like for Palestinians.
In Jerusalem, for example, the
city’s most recent municipal plan, “Jerusalem 2000,” is openly racist,
asserting as its goal the maintenance of a Jewish super-majority in the city.
Accordingly, in recent years, thousands of Palestinians have had their
residency permits revoked and been deported on the basis of technicalities no
Jew ever faces. Kilometer after kilometer of land in the city
continue to be stolen from Palestinians to make way for new Jewish
settlements or private capitalist enterprises. Palestinians’ applications for
permits to build or improve their housing are systematically denied, forcing
them into poorly constructed buildings whose illegality is then used by the government
as an excuse to demolish them, seize the land and expel the residents.
Palestinians face similar efforts at ethnic cleansing, both overt and covert, from
places like Jaffa and Al-Ludd to the villages of the
Negev.
If the more than one and a half
million Palestinians living inside Israel endure such conditions of cruel
apartheid oppression, what of the stateless millions beyond the Green Line? In
Gaza, their access to even the most elementary necessities of life – food and
medicine –is subject to an Israeli blockade which can be accurately compared to
the Nazis’ genocidal siege of Warsaw’s Jewish ghetto. In the West Bank, the
Israeli state is not satisfied with the Palestinian Authority’s work in
brutally oppressing the masses on its behalf and promotes the theft of more
land and more murderous violence by settlers and the Israeli army. Meanwhile,
hundreds of thousands more Palestinians still languish in refugee camps in
Jordan, Lebanon and Syria. Showing that their desire to return to their homeland
remains unbroken, this year on Nakba Day, Palestinian
refugees marched peacefully toward its borders, only to be slaughtered by
Israeli soldiers.
Despite being
appalled, to say the least, by the Israeli protest movement’s chauvinist
indifference to the Palestinians’ plight, we revolutionary socialists support
the current struggle to defend the living standards of Israeli working-class,
poor and young people against capitalism’s attacks. By exposing the Israeli
rulers’ lack of loyalty to the poor, the struggle can begin to break down
support for the Zionist state and thus also weaken its ability to oppress the
Palestinians. Further, the more that Israelis mobilize against their government
and capitalist class in order to defend their living standards, the more likely
the more class-conscious and democratically inclined will be to begin to
surrender their identification with the Zionist state and begin to identify
with the Palestinians’ struggle for liberation.
With this perspective, we
participate in the struggle first and foremost from the perspective of the most
deprived and oppressed victims of this state – the Palestinians. Inside the
movement, in addition to fighting for its demands for price controls on housing
and other essentials of life, we raise the call for the defense of
Palestinians’ lives and livelihoods, starting
with the most basic demands:
Stop the Theft and Destruction of
Palestinian Homes!
Stop the Ethnic Cleansing of
Palestinians from East Jerusalem, Jaffa, Al-Ludd and
the Negev!
Stop the
Settlements! Down with the Wall!
Down with Discrimination Against Palestinians in Housing, Employment and Social
Services!
Down with the
Blockade of Gaza!
CONTRADICTIONS OF THE TWO-STATE LEFT
After weeks
of refusing to say anything about Palestinians, the Tent City leadership
started to become embarrassed by the movement’s obvious racism. So at their
August 6 rally the organizers allowed Uda Basharat of the Communist Party’s electoral front Hadash (the Democratic Front for Peace and Equality) to speak
from its platform.
Basharat surprised many by daring to refer
to the injustice of housing shortages and demolitions experienced by “Arabs.” At
the same time, however, Basharat’s speech made a
number of enormous concessions to the chauvinism of the crowd and of wider
Israeli society. Perhaps most shocking was the fact that while Zionism has done
its best to wipe Palestine off the map, Basharat never once said anything to correct that. Thus he studiously
avoided ever referring to the territory of Palestine or its Palestinian people.
His repeated reference to “Arabs,” and his failure to
mention any place outside the Green Line surely gave many people the impression
that he was only concerned with Palestinians inside Israel. Many Palestinians
surely not have been impressed by Basharat’s refusal
to refer to the ongoing campaign of ethnic cleansing against Palestinians in
East Jerusalem, let alone to the plight of Palestinians in the broader Occupied
Territories. Indeed Basharat made no mention of the
settlements on the West Bank or the starvation blockade of Gaza or of the Wall
that is dividing and trapping Palestinians.[i]
By not challenging the broader
Zionist oppression of Palestinians, Hadash have
actually helped the Zionist leaders of the protest movement cover up their
chauvinism, allowing them to better resist calls by the most left-wing Israeli
protesters for stronger demands in defense of the Palestinians.
We have no illusion that any more
than a small minority of today’s protest movement will support our demands in
defense of the Palestinians. Indeed, it says a lot about the extent to which
Zionist chauvinism and racism have saturated the consciousness of Israelis that
even today’s protest movement, which is based on the minority of Israeli
society that is already more secular, liberal and left-wing, cannot be expected
to support such basic demands.
The Histadrut Must Call a General Strike!
Revolutionary socialists don’t wait for the ideal
conditions before advocating a way forward for working-class struggle. Instead
take as our starting point the current situation and support working-class and
poor people defending themselves against the capitalists and state with
whatever means are immediately available. Therefore, we advocate a struggle by
members of the Histadrut to force the union
federation to really mobilize its members for future protests and to call a
general strike to win the protest movement’s demands for affordable housing and
lower prices for other basic necessities like food and medicine, including an
end to the Valued Added Tax.
At the same time, we maintain that the Histadrut is a racist organization that consistently
refused to defend Palestinians from layoffs and racist attacks, as well as
refusing to organize Palestinian workers both inside and outside of the Green
Line. We support raising demands in defense of the Palestinians inside
individual unions as part of a struggle to break them, in whole or in part,
from the Histadrut so that they may join a movement
of genuine unions, independent of the state, in which Palestinian and Jewish
workers can fight side by side.
Certainly some of the Israeli
activists who have been the movement’s driving force have some concern for the
Palestinians. But their privileged position as Israeli citizens, receiving
access to land and resources denied to Palestinians, has allowed them the
luxury of putting off raising demands on the Palestinians’ behalf. Raising such
demands, these activists have reasoned, would provoke a split from the existing
movement by its large numbers of mainstream and right-wing Zionists, as well as
a backlash from the rest of Israeli society. But if the protest movement
against the capitalist attacks inside Israel is to move forward, a split of the
pro-Palestinian minority from the pro-Zionist majority is exactly what is
needed. The lesson of every working-class struggle and left-wing movement in
Israeli history, from the seamen’s strikes of the 1950s and ’60s, through the
Black Panther movement of the 1970s, to Peace Now’s rise in the 1980s, is that
unless these movements break through the limits of Zionist chauvinism and turn
to the Palestinian masses as allies, they will be swept aside as soon as Israel
launches a new war or anti-Palestinian atrocity.
If this happens again with the current movement, much responsibility
will lie with those organizations which appealed to the most radical protesters
with socialist and even revolutionary rhetoric only to make their peace with
Zionism. Perhaps the most appalling role has been played by Maavak
Sozialisti, the Israeli section of the Committee for
a Workers International (CWI).
Maavak has
capitulated to the movement’s dominant “social justice for Israelis”
chauvinism, never once criticizing the movement’s failure to defend the
Palestinians. Its statements on the struggle use vague calls for opposition to
racist legislation to avoid taking a specific stand against any particular
attack on Palestinians and their rights. Insultingly to Palestinians, whose
expropriation is the foundation of the Israeli state, their paper buries opposition
to racism amidst a list of other injustices it opposes, like discrimination
against people with mental disabilities.
Indeed, while finding space in the special edition of its
newspaper for a whole page of discussion about the protests concerning the high
price Israelis must pay for cottage cheese, it found no room for a single
article devoted to the concerns of Palestinians. Even worse, in their cottage
protest articles, Maavak actually calls for
protectionism of the Israeli dairy industry against Nethanyahu’s
proposal to open the market to imports – showing that Maavak
can muster up a defense of specific Israeli capitalists much more easily than
it can make such an effort on the part of the Palestinians![ii]
We are reminded of a bus ride back from a Nakba Day demonstration at which Maavak
members had advocated their “socialist” two-state solution. On the way home, we
almost felt sorry for the Maavak members as
Palestinians took the opportunity to quite correctly condemn them as “apartheid
socialists.” While we are certain that the Maavak
members subjectively abhor apartheid and racism, their capitulation to Zionism, instead of helping them build a
“united anti-racist struggle,” only isolates them from the Palestinian masses –
the vanguard of any socialist revolution that could ever take place in this
land.
A WARNING
The clearest confirmation of the
fact that the current protest movement has failed to break with Zionist
chauvinism, and a warning of how the movement could actually embolden Israel’s
far-right, came when the notorious follower of the late Meir Kahane, fascist settler Baruch Marzel,
brought a group of his supporters to join the tent city in Tel Aviv. “When it
comes to social issues [for Jews],” Marzel declared,
“I’m more Left than Left.” Such rhetoric should not be surprising. The promise
of socialism to the members of a privileged oppressor people – “national
socialism” – is a defining feature of fascism. The protest movement’s refusal to
raise demands in defense of Palestinian interests while calling for justice for
Israelis practically invited fascists like Marzel to
participate. Some protest organizers actually welcomed the Kahanists’
and settlers’ participation. Many more protesters, however, have opposed their
presence, though they cannot point to a single demand of the movement that has
taken the side of the Palestinians against Zionist attack and thus precluded
the right-wing Zionists’ participation.
If the
struggles of workers and poor people in Israel are to grow to challenge the
capitalists and their state, they must break with Zionism and side with the
Palestinians’ struggle for liberation. The fact that some young Israelis have
been positively influenced by the example of the Egyptian revolution and the
broader uprising in the Arab world shows that there is reason to expect that growing
numbers of Israelis will learn to reject Zionism completely.
Those among today’s protesters
truly committed to a struggle against both capitalism’s worsening poverty and
Zionism’s racist atrocities will have to come to recognize that the Israeli
state in which today’s protesters hope to live with “social justice” is itself,
by its very nature, an injustice to the Palestinians. The state of Israel was
founded on the ethnic cleansing of 700-900,000 Palestinians from their
homeland, and the denial of the rights of those who remained. It can only
survive by means of continued apartheid, land theft and war. All Israel is Occupied Territory!
MUBARAK, ASSAD, THE ISRAELI STATE!
Karl Marx famously declared that the
working class has nothing to lose but its chains. Because the working class has
no fundamental interest in capitalist society, he expected that the workers
would rise up against the states that keep them down. While this is true in
general, it is not true in the case of Israeli workers who, by virtue of their
citizenship, benefit every day from access to land and resources as a result of
the Israeli state’s expropriation and oppression of Palestinians. Very many
Israeli workers participate directly in this colonialism through regular
military service. These experiences fuel Zionist chauvinism and underpin the
Israeli working class’s deep sense of loyalty to the state.
At the same time, Israeli workers
and poor people do have an interest in taking up the cause of Palestinians: of
the powerful imperialist countries of the world, Israel has the greatest gap
between rich and poor, with 20% of Israelis living below the official “poverty
line.” The numbers of Israelis living in poverty has been allowed to rise to
the extent that it has because the masses’ nationalist loyalty to the state has
encouraged them to tolerate their ruling class’s profiteering and discouraged
them from fighting back.
In the long run, Israel will become a death trap for its
Jewish citizens as well. Imperialism’s support for Israel stems from the fact
that its wars and oppression have served the imperialists’ need to keep the
Arab masses down and its oil wealth safe for exploitation. For Israel to
fulfill its role as the region’s imperialist policeman, its ruling class has turned
the Israelis into oppressors on the one hand and cannon fodder on the other.
They demand that Jews kill and be killed serving the
interests of the big capitalists and the government. Any struggle against the
Israeli capitalists can only be successful if it challenges capitalism and
imperialist oppression in the region.
The only way for at least a
class-conscious, internationalist minority of the Israeli working class to join
the Arab revolution is by joining the Palestinian masses in their struggle to
overthrow the Zionist state so that they may enjoy their right to return to
their homeland and enjoy equal rights in it. Because that aim is inconceivable
without the overthrow of imperialism throughout the region, that means fighting
for a Palestinian workers’ state from the river to the sea, as part of a federation
of workers’ states in the entire region. Israeli Jews, having surrendered any rights
to property seized from Palestinians, will have the right to live in Palestine,
without any racial privileges, but free of any form of ethnic or religious
discrimination.
It is the
duty of revolutionaries to work their hardest to make this perspective a
reality. However, despite the fact that we would want to win both Jewish and
Palestinian workers and poor people, we must realize that in all likelihood we
will not be able to recruit the majority of Israeli Jews to actively support the
revolution. Thus our perspective focuses on winning the Palestinian working class and poor, as well as those Jews
willing to join with them, to the aim of making the socialist revolution, while
at least securing the peaceful acceptance of the revolution from the largest
possible number of the rest of the Jewish masses.
Fighting for the Palestinians’
basic rights means fighting for the right of all Palestinians who were expelled
from their homeland, and the right of all their
descendants as well, to return to it. If the Palestinians’ right of return is
realized, they will be the overwhelming majority throughout the land. For this
reason, there is no way to consistently advocate the rights of the Palestinians
while defending the right of Israeli Jews to maintain a state of their own.
Such a state could only survive by means of apartheid rule over the Palestinian
population, or by another wave of brutal ethnic cleansing. The perspective of the regional socialist revolution
offers a way out of this nightmarish alternative.
Recognizing that the Palestinian masses are not strong
enough on their own to overthrow the imperialist-backed Zionist state, we have
all along said that the revolutions by the Arab workers’ of the region would
come to the support of the Palestinians and aid their coming to power. The
revolutionary uprisings that toppled the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt, and
continue to challenge the region’s other strongmen, are just the beginning.
Imperialist capitalism cannot support democracy in these countries. To secure
the democratic freedoms the masses demand, the working class will have to lead
the urban poor and peasants in overthrowing capitalism and building workers’
states on the road to socialism. This is the strategy of permanent revolution.
The workers’ state that would be formed out of the
regional revolution would allow the return of the refugees, who also suffer
from harsh problems in the field of housing, as they were driven off their
lands by Israel. With the return of the refugees, the workers' state would
become Palestinian in its national character. However, Jews who join with the
Palestinians in a revolutionary struggle, will also
become a part of the ruling class – the workers and the poor, Palestinians and
Jews alike.
But for all this to become a reality, the exploited and
oppressed masses must find an international revolutionary working-class
political party capable of leading the struggle to victory. The
internationalist strategy outlined in this statement aims to unite the working
class based on an uncompromising struggle for the interests of capitalism’s
most exploited and oppressed people. It expresses the perspective of authentic
working-class Trotskyism, the anti-Stalinist Marxism of our times. We believe the
vanguard revolutionary party that workers need must aim to re-create the Fourth
International, the Trotskyist World Party of Socialist Revolution.
We invite all those interested to contact us and join in
the discussion of how to take the struggle forward.
For Quality and Cheap Government Housing for All, Palestinians
and Jews!
Stop the Theft and Destruction of
Palestinian Homes!
Stop the Ethnic Cleansing of
Palestinians from East Jerusalem, Jaffa, Al-Ludd and
the Negev!
Stop the Settlements! Down with the Wall!
Down with Discrimination Against Palestinians in Housing, Employment and Social
Services!
Down with the Blockade of Gaza!
For Jewish Solidarity with the Arab Masses!
For a Socialist Revolution in the Middle East!
For a Palestinian Workers’ State
From the River to the Sea!
[i] The transcript of the speech,
“July’s Miracle”, can be found at http://adoomim.wordpress.com/.
[ii] See the special edition in http://maavak.org.il/maavak/pdf/201107.SSM.Tents.pdf,
especially the articles "היום שאחרי מחאת הקוטג': מעלים
הילוך!" and "הסערה החברתית מציעה סדר-יום
חדש לישראל".