A Joint Statement by the
Internationalist Socialist League (Israel/Occupied Palestine)
and the League for the
Revolutionary Party (U.S.)
On the Palestinian
Authority’s UN Bid for Statehood –
No to
the Sellout of Palestinian Rights!
For a Palestinian State From the River to the
Sea!
As soon as Palestinian Authority
(PA) Chairman Mahmoud Abbas announced his intention of appealing to the United
Nations to recognize the PA as the government of a Palestinian state and accept
it as a UN member, the Israeli government and the Obama Administration both
denounced the move. The U.S. government went so far as to promise to veto any proposed
UN resolution recognizing Palestinian statehood and threatened to end its
funding of the PA.
We condemn these racist, imperialist
governments, which are most directly responsible for the historic and
day-to-day oppression of the Palestinian people, and which today are not even
willing to grant Palestinians the minimal concession of a mini-state in the
West Bank and Gaza. However, it would be a mistake for Palestinians and their
supporters to conclude from this that the PA’s UN bid deserves support. In
fact, the PA’s move is an attempt to disarm the Palestinian struggle and force
Palestinians to renounce their rights, just when the Arab masses’ revolutionary
uprisings are renewing hope that the Palestinians’ liberation from Zionist
oppression is possible.
The PA’s statehood bid at the UN is the bitter
fruit of years of negotiations between Fatah and Israel. In the 1993 Oslo Accords,
Abbas’s predecessor Yasser Arafat renounced the Palestinians’ rightful claim to
almost 80% of historic Mandatory Palestine and abandoned the fight for the
right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homeland, in exchange for a
promised state alongside Israel. Since then, Fatah has sought to prove itself a
worthy partner to the Zionists and imperialism by repressing Palestinian
militants, only to have the Zionists predictably break one promise after
another. As Al Jazeera exposed when
it released secret documents from the negotiations, Palestinian negotiators
admitted that “We have
invested time and effort and even killed our own people to maintain order and
the rule of law,” only to see Israel expand settlements in the
Occupied Territories, build the apartheid wall dividing and surrounding
Palestinian communities, attack the PA in the West Bank and starve and bomb
Gaza.
As a result of these betrayals,
Fatah is so widely despised by the Palestinian masses that it has not dared
call elections to the PA for years because it knows it would be thrown out of
office. Its bid in the UN to receive paper recognition of the surviving
Palestinian territories as a state is a pathetic attempt to show the
Palestinian people something for their trouble. Few will be fooled.
The spirit of the PA’s statehood bid
is best captured in the words of its supporters themselves. The PA has launched
a campaign to appeal to Israeli Jews, encouraging them to support Palestinian
statehood. The PA’s propaganda radio carried a message in Russian, addressed to
the large Russian-speaking minority in Israel, which tends to belong to the
right and extreme right, promising them that a Palestinian state will ensure
regional security. Another message in Hebrew called upon Israelis to “support
the two-state solution so that we can live side by side, Israel and Palestine.”[1]
There is nothing wrong in
principle with attempts to appeal to the Israeli masses. In all our statements
on Palestine we emphasize the importance of trying to split the social basis of
the Zionist state by appealing to Israeli Jews to support the Palestinian
struggle. However, there is a great difference between appeals for Israeli Jews
to give up their roles as privileged oppressors and those that ensure them the
continuation of this status. The PA’s promise to live “side by side” with
Israel and ensure its “regional security” can only mean a promise to violently
repress the Palestinian masses who, unlike their bourgeois leaders, will never
surrender their struggle against Zionist injustice.
Israel was founded as a result of
the theft of Palestinian land and the expulsion of nearly a million
Palestinians. All Israel is occupied territory! Living side by side with
Israel means allowing the Zionists to maintain their occupation of the vast
majority of Palestine, continuing its policy of racist discrimination against
Palestinians living within its borders, and finalizing the Nakba
– the expropriation and ethnic cleansing which have made most Palestinians
impoverished and oppressed refugees – because Israel can only exist by denying
the right of all Palestinian refugees to return to their land.
Some groups on the left[2] claim
that the recognition of Palestinian statehood in any form would be a step
forward for the Palestinian resistance and should be supported. Palestinians
have heard such claims before from their leaders when they were excusing their
capitulation to Israel and adoption of the two-state solution. They are as
false now as they have always been. As Joseph Massad has
explained, the idea that any new legal powers won by UN recognition would open
new avenues for Palestinian liberation is a sad illusion:
This logic is faulty, though,
because the Palestinians have not historically lacked legal instruments to
challenge Israel… On the contrary, international instruments have been
activated against Israel since 1948 by the UN's numerous resolutions in the
General Assembly as well as in the Security Council, not to mention the more
recent use of the International Court of Justice in the case of the Apartheid
Wall. The problem has never been the Palestinians' ability or inability to
marshal international law or legal instruments to their side. Instead, the
problem is that the US … blocks international law's jurisdiction from being
applied to Israel through its veto power. The US uses threats and protective
measures to shield the recalcitrant pariah state from being brought to justice.
It has already used its veto power in
the UN Security Council 41 times in defense of Israel and against Palestinian
rights.
Of course, the problem is not with
the U.S. alone. Europe’s imperialist states have shown that they are ultimately
loyal to Israel and will always support Israel’s “security” – in reality, its
occupation of Palestine and existence as an imperialist outpost – over the
rights of Palestinians. Consisting of representatives of the ruling classes of
the world, and dominated by a Security Council of great powers, the UN is
fundamentally an imperialist institution, which the imperialist states use to
enforce their policies on the oppressed countries. It is completely useless for
the defense of the oppressed. In fact, Palestinian participation in the UN will
only help legitimize the occupation of Palestine. As Massad
summed up:
This presumed addition of power
the Palestinians will gain to bring Israel to justice will actually be carried
out at enormous cost to the Palestinian people… It will politically weaken
Palestinian refugees' right to return to their homes and be compensated, as
stipulated in UN resolutions … Indeed,
some international legal experts fear it could even abrogate the Palestinians'
right of return altogether. It will also forfeit the rights of Palestinian
citizens of Israel who face institutional and legal racism in the Israeli
state, as it presents them with a fait accompli of the existence of a
Palestinian state (its phantasmatic nature
notwithstanding) …[3]
Another danger mentioned by Massad is that the U.S. and Israel will make the
recognition of a Palestinian state in Gaza and the West Bank conditioned on
Palestinian and international recognition of Israel as a Jewish state. Thus,
the price of accepting UN recognition is colossal compared to the very small
advantage it offers Palestinians.
While revolutionaries and all
champions of Palestinian liberation should not support the PA’s resolution, we
do oppose the imperialists’ right to veto and will participate in protests to
that end because they can begin to mobilize the Palestinian masses in a renewed
struggle for all their rights. The PA knows this and is preparing to repress
the masses in such a case. In fact, as Haaretz reported, Israel just
approved the PA’s purchase of new armor and weaponry from Israeli companies for
the purpose of putting down renewed Palestinian protests.[4]
Who Supports the UN Bid?
The rabid opposition by Israel and
the U.S. to the bid might cause supporters of the Palestinians to be suspicious
towards groups claiming to be pro-Palestinian who are opposed to the bid. Thus,
it is important to examine some of the organizations and individuals supporting
the UN bid.
The PLO and Fatah in particular
used to be the main force in the Palestinian resistance. Today, after decades
of betrayals and the corruption which has spread throughout the organization,
thanks to its leaders’ acceptance of U.S. and Zionist payments to the PA, Fatah
represents no one but itself. Abbas himself is the favored agent of the U.S.
and Israel in Palestine. Another Fatah leader, Mohammed Dahlan, was responsible
in 2007 for an attempted U.S.- and Israeli-backed coup against the elected
Hamas government in Gaza.[5]
There is no consensus among the
opposition parties in Israel on the Palestinian state. Tzipi
Livni, leader of the main opposition party Kadima, has not taken a clear position, saying instead that
the vote will not bring peace, and even “blaming” the bid on the government’s
refusal to hold negotiations. In the Labor Party, some like former General Matan Vilnai are opposed to the
bid, while others like Isaac Herzog support it.[6] With the
elections for party chairperson about to take place on Monday, candidates Sheli Yechimovitch and Amir Peretz maintain their silence on this question.
Palestinian Opposition to PA
Betrayals
Opposition to the bid is hardly
limited to the governments of Israel and the US and their supporters. Also
opposing the bid are the Hamas government in Gaza,[7] as well
as pro-Palestinian left-wingers like Massad, As’ad AbuKhalil[8] and Ali Abunimah.[9] Abunimah correctly notes that
It is not “The Palestinians”
making this move but the unelected, unaccountable PA leaders who have no
mandate whatsoever from the vast majority of living Palestinians … the price of
admission of an imaginary Palestinian “state” to the UN, may be the real rights
and futures of Palestinians to actual self-determination … The effort to seek
diplomatic recognition for an imaginary Palestinian state on a fraction of
historic Palestine is a strategy of desperation from a Palestinian leadership
that has run out of options, lost its legitimacy, and become a serious obstacle
in the way of Palestinians regaining their rights.
Abunimah cites
extensively a statement by Boycott National Committee (BNC), “the steering
group of the international boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) campaign” on
the Palestinian UN bid. The BNC opposes the bid for many good reasons, but it
exposes its own main weakness in one of the arguments it makes:
The right to self-determination …
in the case of Palestinians is represented by the Palestine Liberation Organization
(PLO) … Until the Palestinian people exercises its right to self determination,
the PLO remains the sole legitimate representative that represents all
Palestinians in the UN and in other international, regional and multinational
forums. No alternative will be accepted by the great majority of the
Palestinian people.
It is true that the PLO was the
main organization of the Palestinian resistance up until a couple of decades
ago. But then, its leaders betrayed the Palestinians in their agreements with
the Zionists for a supposed two-state solution, and the masses have been
abandoning them ever since. In fact, the great majority of the Palestinian
people in Gaza and the West Bank – the most oppressed of all Palestinians –
have already shown that they do not see the PLO as their representative, let
alone their sole representative, when they elected the Hamas government in
2006. The PLO, and especially Fatah, have been irreversibly corrupted by their
collaboration with Israel and the US since the beginning of the negotiations
that led eventually to the Oslo Accords. The BNC nevertheless fantasizes that
the PLO can somehow be reconstituted as a democratic, popular organization:
Diplomatic recognition must result
in protection of the inalienable right to self-determination of the entire
Palestinian people represented by a democratized and inclusive PLO that
represents not just Palestinians under occupation, but also the exiled
refugees, the majority of the Palestinian people, as well as the discriminated
citizens of Israel.
However, the political evolution
of even the most militant tendencies of the PLO, as well as Hamas, show that
all organizations taking a nationalist approach to the Palestinian struggle
will eventually find themselves at the negotiating table, haggling over the
terms of surrender to Zionism. Since the Zionist state is backed by
imperialism, the Palestinians need the support of revolutionary uprisings of
the Arab masses in neighboring states if they are to win. A perspective of
united revolutionary struggles of working-class and poor people across the
borders of the region means a complete break from nationalism and to a
working-class internationalist strategy.
The hopeless attempt to
reconstitute the PLO is characteristic of the strategic bankruptcy of the BDS
movement. BDS campaigners have courageously refused to surrender the fight for
Palestinians’ basic rights, but at the same time have admitted that they have
no answer to how those goals can be achieved and so they have promoted their
“not solutions-based” movement.[10] But as
we have said, the unfolding revolutionary struggles of the exploited and
oppressed Arab masses are just beginning to show the possibility of the full
and complete liberation of the Palestinian people from the nightmare of Zionist
oppression.
The Way Forward – Workers and Poor
People Must Take Lead!
Recognizing that the Palestinian
masses are not strong enough on their own to defeat Zionist oppression, we have
all along said that the revolutions by the Arab workers of the region would
come to the support of the Palestinians and aid their s. The revolutionary
uprisings that toppled the dictators of Tunisia and Egypt, and continue to
challenge the region’s other strongmen, are just the beginning. Imperialist
capitalism cannot support democracy in these countries. To secure the
democratic freedoms that the masses demand, the working class will have to lead
the urban poor and peasants in overthrowing capitalism and building workers’
states on the road to socialism. This is the Trotskyist strategy of permanent
revolution.
In the long run, Israel will
become a death trap for its Jewish citizens as well. Imperialism’s support for
Israel stems from the fact that its wars and oppression have served the
imperialists’ need to keep the Arab masses down and its oil wealth safe for
exploitation. Thus, Arab revolutionaries can and should appeal to Israeli Jews
– but only on the basis that they break with Zionism and join the Palestinian
revolution, not on the basis of promises to the Zionists that they can retain
their privileged position in any part of Palestine.
The workers’ state that would be
formed out of the regional revolution would allow the return of the refugees
who were driven off their lands by Israel. With the return of the refugees, the
workers’ state would become Palestinian in its national character. However,
Jews who join with the Palestinians in a revolutionary struggle, will also
become a part of the ruling class – the workers and the poor, Palestinians and
Jews alike.
For all this to become a reality,
the exploited and oppressed masses must find an international revolutionary
working-class political party capable of leading the struggle to victory. The
internationalist strategy outlined in this statement aims to unite the working
class based on an uncompromising struggle for the interests of the people most
exploited and oppressed by capitalism. It expresses the perspective of
authentic working-class Trotskyism, the anti-Stalinist Marxism of our times. We
believe the vanguard revolutionary party that workers need must aim to
re-create the Fourth International, the Trotskyist World Party of Socialist
Revolution.
All Israel is Occupied Territory!
For Right of Return of the
Palestinian Refugees to their Homeland!
For a Palestinian Workers’ State from
the River to the Sea!
For a Socialist Federation of the
Middle East!
[2] Simon Hardy, “Will
the UN General Assembly recognize Palestinian statehood,” http://www.workerspower.co.uk/2011/08/will-the-un-general-assembly-recognise-palestinian-statehood/.
[3] Joseph Massad, “State of recognition,” Al Jazeera English, September 15, 2011, http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/09/20119158427939481.html.
[4] Amos Harel, “Israel okays PA’s acquisition of anti-riot gear
ahead of UN vote,” Haaretz,
September 15, 2011, http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/israel-okays-pa-s-acquisition-of-anti-riot-gear-ahead-of-un-vote-1.384530.
[5] ISL founding members
were among the very few socialists in the world to take a principled stand in
defense of the elected Hamas government against this imperialist-backed coup
attempt while at the same time correctly refusing to give any political support
to Hamas. For more, see the Internationalist Socialist League, “The ISL’s break
with the IMT,” http://www.the-isleague.com/the-isls-break-with-imt-english.php.
[8] As’ad
AbuKhalil, “Palestinian statehood as UN theater,”
July 27, 2011, http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/07/palestinian-statehood-as-un-theater.html.
[9] Ali Abunimah, “Recognizing Palestine?” http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/04/2011413152522296883.html,
and “How Palestinian Authority’s UN ‘statehood’ bid endangers Palestinian
rights,” http://electronicintifada.net/blog/ali-abunimah/how-palestinian-authoritys-un-statehood-bid-endangers-palestinian-rights.
[10] Omar Barghouti, “The South Africa Moment in Palestine,”
http://www.bdsmovement.net/2009/the-south-africa-moment-in-palestine-382.