ISL's Position Paper for the "Haifa
Conference for the Right of Return and One Democratic State"
May 2010
What do we stand for?
We, who
came to participate in the "Haifa Conference ", are here to discuss
the key question of the struggle for liberation: how to realize the Palestinian
people's right to self-determination, including the right of the refugees who
were driven out by Israel in 1947-8, in all of its stolen land of Palestine.
All the while, the persecution of the Palestinian people worsens, for example
the persecution of Amir Makhoul and Omar Sa'id, or the worsening of the conditions of detention of
Hamas prisoners. All the while, the representatives of U.S. and Israeli
imperialism, together with the representatives of the cooperationist
Palestinian Authority, are discussing the question of how could they ensure the
existence and security of the Zionist imperialist state occupying more than 80
percent of Palestine and denying the Palestinian refugees the right to return
to their homes. According to the local media, Abbas
has offered the Zionists even more territorial capitulations; however, the
Zionist expansionist appetite remains insatiable. All the while, according to
local media, Hamas, who constantly sends messages of willingness to de-facto
recognize Israel within the '67 borders, is busy oppressing the Palestinians
and plans for the destruction of 150 houses of poor families in the besieged
Gaza, on grounds of unauthorized construction, with complete disregard to the
damaged already caused by the Zionist army.
The Arab
League, which represents the rulers of the bourgeois states in the region, has
also expressed its support for the idea that peace could be achieved between
Israel and the Arabs on the basis of the establishment of a Palestinian
mini-state alongside Israel. However, in Palestine, there is no way to realize
both the right of oppressor Israel and the oppressed Palestinian people to
self-determination. One must choose sides and we have chosen to side with the
oppressed. A Palestinian mini-state, even if established, won't be anything but
a sorry caricature of the Palestinian right to self-determination.
There will
never be any peace in the region while imperialism, which includes the State of
Israel, rules the Middle East. It was imperialism that tore the region apart
and it was imperialism that stood behind the establishment of Israel. The main
role of Israel is to serve as the spearhead of imperialist control over the
region. Israel's main export are imperialist wars and
the oppression of the Palestinians and the Arab masses in the region. The Arab
bourgeoisie and Monarchs are cooperating with imperialism because they are
afraid of a mass revolutionary uprising and are willing to settle for a slice
of the exploitation pie rather than risk losing control over the masses, which
could lead to a socialist revolution.
Even the
attempts of the more radicalized petty bourgeois, the Nasserites and the Ba'athists, to liberate the region and the Palestinian
people from imperialism, have failed as a result of
their own fear of socialist revolution. Thus, it is safe to conclude that the
bourgeoisie and the petty bourgeoisie, whether secular or religious, cannot
lead an anti-imperialist revolution because there is no possibility to fulfill
the historical roles of the bourgeois democratic revolution, within the
framework of capitalist states, in the epoch of capitalist decay. The roles of
the liberation of the region, including Palestine, the return of the refugees,
rest solely on the shoulders of the super-exploited working class in the Arab
states, Turkey, and Iran, while the Palestinians are already standing in the
front line of the struggle and will be, without a doubt, the best fighters for
the socialist revolution.
The main
question at hand is: what would be the revolutionary program, perspective an strategy, that would lead to the liberation of the region
and the establishment of a Palestinian state from the river to the sea.
The Class Nature of the
State of Israel
Israel
is an imperialist state. What is imperialism? An imperialist state uses its
economic and military power to control and super-exploit the raw materials and
the working class of poor nations. In order to understand this phenomenon one
must understand that tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall,
or the FRP.
The
development of capitalist economy leads to the Falling Rate of Profit. It is
caused by the decrease of the share the workers' labor power in the process of
production. If capitalism could maintain its free market character, the
competition between capitalists would have forced inefficient firms into
bankruptcy and thus stabilize the rate of profit. However, in the epoch of
imperialist, the economy is controlled by monopoly capital and big-business
bankruptcy threatens the very existence of the capitalist system itself. This
is why the bourgeois state rushes to intervene and bail the failing companies
out, thus enabling the FRP tendency to continue uninterrupted. This is what
caused the collapse of the USSR and this is the cause of the 2007 crisis which
deepens nowadays. The only way left for monopoly capital to counter the FRP is
to super-exploit the working masses of the "Third World
" through miniscule wages.
In this sense Israel is not
different from the United States, Japan, Australia and Canada. It is the only
society in the region which has been a (British) colony in its past and became
an imperialist state. The other bourgeois states in the region, including Egypt
and Iran, are not imperialist states, but part of the third world. Israel
became an imperialist state in the 1960s as a result of the economic, political
and military support of the imperialist states, which saw it as a strategic
asset to be used against the region’s masses.
What’s special about Israel
is that it is a society of colonialist settlers, much like South Africa under
the Apartheid regime, Rhodesia (Zimbabwe), and "French "
Algeria, and it is the last state of its kind. Its fate will be the same as
those of its sisters. Zionist ideology is racist and reactionary, expressing
its colonialist expropriatory nature.
The Jewish working class in
Israel is not revolutionary because it is part of the colonialist settler
society. Historical experience shows that neither the poverty nor the ethnicity
(as the experience of the Black Panthers and the Eastern Rainbow showed) of
Jewish workers can cause them to fight alongside the Palestinian masses, nor
even military defeats (as we have seen following the attack on Lebanon in
2006). The only event that could push some of the Jewish workers in Israel into
revolutionary positions is a revolutionary victory of the working class in other
countries, and especially the neighboring states.
The only consistent
revolutionary force in this region is the super-exploited working class in
Egypt, Algeria, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Turkey and the rest of the region’s
countries. It lacks revolutionary consciousness today, but this will change
with the development of the class struggle in the region. What might push some
Jewish Israeli workers to revolutionary positions is the victory of the working
class in other countries and especially the neighboring states.
Historical experience since
1947 shows that those who support the partition of the land and giving most of
it to the Zionists support the rulers of the Zionist state. It is not by
accident that the CPI, which supported the partition, also imported arms to the
Zionist gangs, which they used to expel the Palestinian masses while carrying
out over 30 massacres.
In the past, the leaders of
the CPI raised the slogan "what’s good for the worker is good for Israel
". In fact they are saying: what’s good for Israel is good for the Zionist
worker. In this way they expose the fact that they express the interests of the
professional and intellectual middle class on the one hand and those of the
proletarian aristocracy, including parts of the Histadrut
bureaucracy, on the other.
Those who support the idea of
a Palestinian mini-state alongside Israel raise the same "solution " of Apartheid rule in South Africa, with
mini-states known as Bantustans. If such a state will be created, as a result
of a severe crisis for Zionism or a grave defeat for the Palestinian struggle,
the Palestinian citizens of Israel will be deported there with or without the
lands which they occupy – so called "border corrections" or "Populated-Area Exchange
Plan". The refugees will not return as
long as Israel exists.
The Right of
Self-Determination
It is impossible to support
the self-determination of the Israelis in any way and at the same time support
the right of self-determination of the Palestinian people. The Palestinians
people includes five million refugees, and along with those living as second
class citizens in Israel and those living in the territories conquered in 1967,
numbers over 9 million people.
The imperialists and
reformists who support the existence of Israel in fact support the oppression
of the Palestinian people, and deny in practice the refugees’ right of return,
even if the claim otherwise, as all Israel is occupied Palestinian territory,
and many Israelis will fight with arms in hand to prevent the return of the
refugees which will make them a minority. We, as revolutionary Marxists,
support only the self-determination of oppressed peoples. Supporting the
oppressors’ right of self-determination is the role of the imperialists
states and its supporters.
The working class in Israel
is different from that in the rest of the world. Whether in the third world,
where the working class is super-exploited, or in the imperialist states,
workers rose up time and time again against the rule of the oppressive bourgeoisie.
Israel has no such history of struggle. In order to understand the difference,
it is enough to see how the workers in the USA came out against the Bush
administration after the failures of the American occupation in Iraq were
exposed, while the great majority of Israeli Jews became more patriotic,
right-wing and racist after the blows dealt to the army in Lebanon and Gaza.
Two
States for Two Peoples?
Those who support the
position of two states for two peoples are divided into two groups: those who
call, like the CPI/Hadash, for the establishment of a
bourgeois state next to the imperialist Israeli state, which will continue to
control 80 percent of Palestine, and those like Maavak
Sozialisti (Israeli CWI) and similar groups, which
call for two separate or federated "socialist " states.
The difference between these
two positions is in essence cosmetic, since the interest of the world working
class is not in a state of Israel with a social-democratic regime with a
nationalized economy, which will merely be a "socialist
" Apartheid state, but in a Palestinian workers state from the
Jordan to the sea. Those who call for two states for two peoples base
themselves on the proposition that the consciousness of Jewish workers in
occupied Palestine is racist, and in order to please them and convince them to
behave like a revolutionary class they must be given the right of
self-determination. This argument only shows how much they have capitulated to
this reactionary consciousness.
A
Secular Democratic State?
The state has a class
character, since every state is a tool for the rule of the ruling class. In a
workers state the ruling class is the working class. Working class democracy
has a form too, and this form is that of the rule of workers’ councils: councils
whose representatives are democratically elected by the working class. The
elected leadership of the supreme workers’ council is also the government. It
is a necessary condition for the rule of the workers' councils that their
leadership would be a revolutionary leadership of the conscious working class.
Workers' councils under reformist leadership are not a revolutionary organ.
Such a government can also come about as the result of a coalition of the
revolutionary workers’ party with other parties which defend the workers’
revolution. A workers’ state can come about only as the result of an armed
uprising of the working class at the leadership of the masses, after the
destruction of the bourgeois state apparatus.
The Bolshevik revolution has
been the only victorious workers revolution in history thus far. But due to the
isolation of this revolution, in turn due to the failure of the revolutionary
wave in the 1920s and 1930s, the Stalinist counterrevolution took over the
workers state and destroyed it during the time of the great purges. In WWII,
Stalinist Russia was an imperialist state, and this explains its support for
the establishment of the state of Israel as a wall against working class
revolutions.
A bourgeois state also has a
form of rule, and in periods of low class struggle, its normative for is the
parliamentary regime. Today most of the groups opposed to the slogan of two
states for two peoples support, in one way or another, the establishment of one
bourgeois state, under the banner of a secular democratic state.
This program has an advantage
over the two-state program since it does not give up on the entire territory of
Palestine (river to sea) and does not betray the Palestinian right of return.
However, its weakness is in as much as it cannot offer a strategy to bring
about a revolutionary change. It does not recognize the fact that the national
question in Palestine cannot be resolved within the framework of the capitalist
system, and it does not view the working class as the agent which can lead the
masses to a victorious revolution.
Can a bourgeois state be
created in Palestine? In the conditions of South Africa, the struggle of the
black masses led to the overthrow of the white racist regime. But with no
revolutionary workers party in existence, the ANC and the Communist Party
leadership managed to block the proletarian revolution. The result is the
continuing suffering of the black masses, as a privileged layer of blacks
joined the dominant white bourgeoisie. The state of the black masses, oppressed
and exploited today in South Africa, is no different than that of the masses in
Egypt, the Egyptian state being one of the pillars of imperialist control in
the region – among other things, it collaborates with the Zionist siege on
Gaza.
In the conditions of the
Middle East, the establishment of an independent bourgeois Palestinian state
with a parliamentary regime is even less likely than in South Africa. There
millions of black workers and poor were ruled by a small racist minority. On
the other hand, imperialist rule in the region leans not only in Israel but on
the other bourgeois states. Without a working class revolution, imperialism
will continue to dominate and will oppose with all its might the creation of a
bourgeois Palestinian state all over Palestine, with the local bourgeoisie,
including the Palestinian, assisting it – and anyone who observes the
relationship of Fatah, the USA and Israel can understand this.
A workers' state is a secular
one by definition, i.e. it has undergone a radical separation of religion and
state, and it is a democracy of the masses led by the working class and not a
democracy of a small bourgeois minority.
The Palestinian masses,
fighting in the front line against imperialism, are not strong enough to
overthrow Israel. But their struggle is not isolated – it is part of the
struggle of the working class and the masses of the region. This is a force
which, if made conscious of its historical mission, can overpower the rulers of
Israel and the collaborationist Arab rulers, the tools of Israel and American
and European imperialism.
Our real comrades in this
struggle are the workers of the world, who show active solidarity with the
Palestinian people. The increasing isolation of Israel in the world today is
the result of the actions of a mass movement, in which the working class plays
an important role, and which clearly sees Israel as an enemy.
Permanent Revolution
The damage the Stalinists
brought upon the workers' movement is terrible. It keeps them away from
understanding that a socialist revolution is the only way leading towards a
more progressive society. The crushing of the USSR as a workers' state by the
Stalinists was a great service to the imperialists. The importance of Trotsky
and the Trotskyist movement in the time when Trotsky
was alive lies in the fact that it fought to defend the principles of
revolutionary Marxism against the Stalinist corruption. Trotsky's theoretical
contribution, known as the "Theory of Permanent Revolution", is the
key to this region's liberation as well as the liberation of the Palestinian
people.
Trotsky explained that in
countries which did not undergo a democratic revolution, the bourgeoisie is
unable to fulfill the roles of the democratic revolution – emancipation from
imperialism, industrialization, agrarian revolution, women's liberation, and
formal equality. The petty bourgeois class does not have its own mode of
production and it can join forces either with the bourgeoisie or the
proletariat. This is the reason why the roles of the democratic revolution fall
on the shoulders of the working class at the leadership of the masses. These
roles will be fulfilled once the working class seizes power and establishes
workers' states (transitional societies towards socialism). The success of
working class in poorer countries to fulfill the socialistic roles is
rooted in the success of the working class in the more technologically advanced
countries in overthrowing their own bourgeoisie. That is why we recommend, that
anyone who seeks a revolutionary solution to the Palestinian national question,
should study this theory closely and understand that revolutionary workers'
parties could be nothing but Trotskyist. The problem
with the Forth International established by the Trotskyists
in 1938 was destroyed as a revolutionary party of the world revolution by
petty-bourgeois revisionists who developed theories and positions which serve
the ruling classes, and that was the cause of its disintegration. The need
today is to re-create the Fourth International on the basis of revolutionary
Marxist principles, i.e. authentic Trotskyism.
FOR THE RETURN OF THE
REFUGEES!
FREEDOM TO ALL PALESTINIAN
POLITICAL PRISONERS!
FOR A PALESTINIAN WORKERS'
STATE FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA!
FOR A SOCIALIST FEDERATION
OF THE MIDDLE EAST!
FOR THE RE-CREATION OF THE
FOURTH INTERNATIONAL, THE WORLD PARTY OF SOCIALIST REVOLUTION!